find out what versions they themselves are copies of) and examine the historical context of their authors to determine what version is “right” when there are differences. (The earliest known manuscript of what’s now in our New Testament is a short copy of a part of John 18 dated to the early second century.) Scholars trace the origins of these manuscripts (ie. Textual criticism is the process of trying to figure out what the originals actually said, generally by examining as many ancient manuscripts as possible. As he studied more, however, he realized that we most definitely don’t have the original words of the New Testament in our Bibles today – so how can we claim that the Bible is the pure, unadulterated word of God? Especially in the first few centuries after Christ, individual books were written, passed around among congregations, and copied – sometimes with unintentional mistakes sometimes with intentional changes to “correct” what was read to better reflect the scribe’s own beliefs. Ehrman begins with his background as a youth in an evangelical church, one which accepted the Bible as the unerring word of God. This is a very readable introduction to textual criticism of the New Testament.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |